When is intellectual property needed as a carrot for innovators

Sign In or Create an Account. Sign In. Advanced Search. Search Menu. Article Navigation. Close mobile search navigation Article Navigation. Volume 7. E-mail: engel coll. Oxford Academic. Google Scholar. Select Format Select format. Permissions Icon Permissions.

Abstract Policymakers all over the world claim that there can be no innovation without protection. Issue Section:. You do not currently have access to this article. An Experiment on the Deterrence of Innovation by Imitation. In the policy debate, intellectual property is often justified by what seems to be a straightforward argument: if innovators are not protected against others appropriating their ideas, incentives for … Expand.

View 1 excerpt, cites background. View 2 excerpts, cites methods and background. The legal regulation of interoperability in an oligopolistic market. It is crucial to the economy as it records vital design information … Expand. Highly Influenced. View 39 excerpts, cites background and methods.

Related Papers. Abstract 3 Citations Related Papers. However, remote access to EBSCO's databases from non-subscribing institutions is not allowed if the purpose of the use is for commercial gain through cost reduction or avoidance for a non-subscribing institution.

Jun, Vol. Author s : Engel, Christoph. Abstract: Policymakers all over the world claim that there can be no innovation without protection. For more than a century, critics have objected that the case for intellectual property is far from clear. This article uses a game theoretic model to organize the debate.